Show Sidebar Log in
  • Home
  • About Us
    • News
    • Admin
  • Journal
    • About JFSR
    • People
    • Features
    • Volumes
    • Subscriptions
    • Submissions
    • Advertising
  • Blog
    • About the FSR Blog
    • People
    • Submissions
    • @theTable
    • Open Calls
  • Books
    • All Titles
    • About FSR Books
    • FSR Bookstore
  • LAB
    • About LAB
    • People
    • Feminists Talk Religion Podcast
  • Across Generations
    • Description
    • Process
    • Video Projects
  • Donate
  • Conferences
  • Awards

Socioeconomic Status in Early Christianity and Thecla’s Rejection of Marriage

Volume 27 Number 2
Author(s):
Katherine Bain
Abstract:

Histories of women continue to debate wealthy women's access to leadership in the ancient world. Scholarly interpretations of women's religious status in the eastern Mediterranean have rested on views of women's (subordinate) social status. However, the frameworks used to analyze social status have not included a thorough economic analysis. Adequate investigation of texts about religion and socioeconomic status requires a critical framework that analyzes gender, race, ethnicity, marriage, slavery, sexuality, and colonialization as well as religion and access to wealth. Bain proposes an approach based on kyriarchy and guided by feminist historical material inquiry. Analyses of the ancient economy depend on contemporary economic theory, and women and lower-status men remain in the margins even in analyses of contemporary economic systems. The omission of gender, race, class, sexuality, and colonialism as categories of socioeconomic analysis has significant consequences for economic models, since these distinctions are embedded in notions of public/private, competition/affection, productivity, family, household, and labor. After elaborating this approach and comparing it to other methods in use, Bain illustrates its potential in a conversation with current scholarship on the Acts of Paul and Thecla. Archaeological sources constitute an essential element of this analysis.

DOI: 10.2979/jfemistudreli.27.2.51

Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/jfemistudreli.27.2.51

 

Back to Volume 27, Number 2

Recent Blog Posts

  • Can We Speak? When Speech Has Color: Aphonic Speech and Respectability Politics

    April 27, 2022
  • The FSR Blog is Hiring!

    April 21, 2022
  • “Standing Up To Russian Aggression Really Brings Out His Eyes”: Zelenskyy Thirst-Trapping

    April 18, 2022
  • Dante’s Regressive Body Politics: How Dante Brought an Ableist, Misogynist, and Domineering Hell to Earth

    March 9, 2022
  • Where Have All the Women Gone? (@theTable: “Unorthodox Media”)

    February 18, 2022

Recent JFSR Articles

  • The Tentative Mufassira

    September 29, 2021
  • More Than a Feminist Hobby: Gender as an Analytical Category in Qurʾanic Studies

    September 29, 2021
  • Emotive Energy and Pleasure: Centering Female Figures in Qurʾanic Narratives

    September 29, 2021

@theTable Blog Series

FSR Summer Book Club

Racism and the Feminist Study of Religion

Manthologies

Parenting in the Field

Planetary Solidarity

Transcending Transphobia

Intersecting Islamophobia

Feminism Online

Contact Us

Managing Office: [email protected]

Journal Office: [email protected]

Blog Office: [email protected]

>> More Contacts

Copyright 2015 © Feminist Studies in Religion, Inc.
All rights reserved. Direct questions to [email protected]

Login